For anyone building or deploying AI in the EU who wants to know what the law requires before a regulator tells them.
§ 1
Proposal
Before we talk about obligations, we work out whether you are a provider or a deployer of each system you use, by looking at how the product is built.
We can tell a model from a system and RAG from retraining. That is why we classify your risk in writing, with dates.
We use it in our own work and say so openly. That is how we know what it can and cannot do.
Most companies need less than they fear. The AI Radar separates what applies today from what comes later, and if the Regulation does not affect you, we will say so.
§ 2
Articles
We write about the work we do. Reading these articles is the fastest way to see how we think before you hire us.
§ 3
LUDUS
Free LUDUS games, no sign-up, built on the same rules we work by. If your case does not need a lawyer, they will tell you.
It places every AI Act obligation that applies to you on the calendar.
5#2AF598The AI RadarIt checks your AI product against the law before you launch it.
2#2AF598Green Light§ 4
Services
Each service has a fixed scope and a published starting price. The exact amount, with foreseeable costs, is set out in the engagement letter.
In seven days you will receive a report with your AI Act adaptation plan.
We will draft your notices, your marking policy and your supplier clauses.
You will receive your systems classified and your compliance file in writing.
You will know whether your system can be used and with what safeguards.
You will receive the technical file, the conformity strategy and your contracts.
§ 5
Lawyers
Book directly with whoever you prefer. If you have not decided, we will assign a lawyer when you book the Virtual Consultation.

I see legal practice as a discipline of precision. I work where the law meets technology and cross-border operations, and I read code and contracts with the same attention. Before accepting an engagement I tell you whether it is worth pursuing and what it costs, at a fixed price.

I work where economic law meets technology: litigation, contracts and artificial intelligence systems. I am drawn to the ground where the rules are still being written, and I have brought that same rigour to litigation since my first year in practice.
§ 6
Questions
Yes, as a deployer, with fewer obligations than the company that builds the system.
What you must do depends on the use: train the people who operate it, disclose AI-generated content and, if the tool makes decisions about people, meet additional requirements.
With the Virtual Consultation: in one hour we review your systems and tell you which engagement fits, if any does.
If you want to arrive prepared, play Green Light or The AI Radar first and bring us the result. The €90 fee is deducted from the engagement.
Yes, and it is the best moment, because changing the architecture later costs more.
We read the technical documentation and the code when needed, and tell you which design decisions shape your role and your risk level.
You keep our view on your case and pay nothing more.
If your case does not need a lawyer, we will tell you during the consultation. If it does, you will receive an engagement letter with a fixed price before you pay anything else.
Sixty minutes on Google Meet with a qualified lawyer. It costs €90 including VAT and will be deducted from the first invoice if an engagement follows.